Who Decides What India Eats? The Silent Brahminisation of Indian Food Habits

India is home to 1.4 billion people, speaking over 700 languages, practicing multiple faiths, and representing thousands of culinary traditions. And yet, when it comes to public discourse around food — what is “pure,” what is “civilized,” what is “ethical” — there remains a quiet, stubborn dominance of one particular narrative: the Brahminical one.

This isn’t about blaming a community, but about exposing a cultural legacy that continues to shape how food is perceived, regulated, and politicized in India today.

The Myth of Vegetarian India

Ask an average Indian — or worse, a foreign tourist — what Indian food is, and they’ll likely mention paneer, dal, and roti. Rarely will they speak of pork in Nagaland, beef curries in Kerala, dried fish chutneys in Bengal, or mutton gravies in Telangana.

That’s because Indian food, in its “national” avatar, has been systematically sanitized and Brahminised — made to reflect the food habits of a minority upper caste that historically regarded meat, onion, garlic, and even certain pulses as impure.

But the truth? Over 70% of Indians eat meat. They just don’t always get to own that fact in public. School midday meals in many states exclude eggs due to opposition from upper-caste lobbies, despite widespread protein deficiency among children. Government functions, temple prasadams, airline meals — often default to vegetarian, subtly implying that it’s somehow the higher or holier choice.

Caste Hegemony on a Plate

In Indian culture, food is not just sustenance — it’s a deeply caste-coded practice.

What you eat can determine your social rank. Dalit and Adivasi food — rich in local grains, pork, beef, wild greens — is often dismissed as “unclean” or “backward.” Even in urban India, beef-eaters can be evicted from apartments, pork is a political taboo, and meat consumption is policed in the name of festivals, faiths, or morality.

You may have the right to vote — but in many Indian households, you don’t have the right to eat what your ancestors ate.

This is not freedom. This is Brahminical control dressed up as tradition.

When Modern Diets Echo Old Hierarchies

Ironically, the global rise of veganism, plant-based diets, and cruelty-free eating has provided a second wind to this Brahminical narrative. Urban elites, including many upper castes, now use modern terms like “clean eating” to describe what their ancestors simply called satvik.

The language has changed, but the hierarchy remains.

In many cases, it becomes a new kind of moral superiority — not based on compassion, but on privilege. Because it’s easier to preach veganism when you can afford almond milk and quinoa. It’s easier to look down on meat-eaters when your kitchen is stocked with supplements and smoothies.

The Right to Food is the Right to Dignity

The problem isn’t vegetarianism. The problem is when vegetarianism becomes a cultural weapon — a way to exclude, humiliate, or delegitimize the food traditions of the majority.

Food is identity. To be denied your food is to be denied your place in the cultural conversation. And that’s what India has done for centuries — equating “pure” food with caste purity, and using it to draw invisible lines between the privileged and the rest.

In Conclusion

Even today, the food habits of 1.4 billion people are disproportionately shaped by a cultural elite that comprises less than 5% of the population. This is not accidental. It’s the continuation of a caste-based control over body, identity, and desire — one meal at a time.

To decolonize Indian food, we must first decaste it.

We must ask uncomfortable questions about why beef is taboo but ghee is sacred, why eggs are banned in school lunches but Coca-Cola isn’t, and why temple kitchens are celebrated while Dalit kitchens are hidden from view.

India doesn’t need one national diet. It needs a national appetite for truth.

Published by askenni

I am a professional astrologer from India.